Effective Field Goal Percentage

What is Effective Field Goal Percentage in Basketball?

Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%) is a vital basketball statistic that offers a more accurate representation of a player’s shooting performance. It adjusts the traditional field goal percentage to take into account the distinction between two-point shots and three-point shots. This metric provides a clearer picture of a player’s true scoring ability, as it recognizes the added value of three-point shots.

In conventional field goal percentage calculation, both two-point and three-point baskets are treated equally. However, this method can be misleading as it doesn’t reflect the extra point earned from a successful three-point shot. eFG% steps in to correct this issue by giving additional weight to three-pointers, ensuring that a player’s overall shooting effectiveness is represented more accurately.

By incorporating the value of three-point shots into the calculation, eFG% has become an essential tool for analyzing players’ shooting efficiency within the modern game of basketball. This advanced metric goes beyond standard field goal percentage, providing coaches, analysts, and fans with a deeper understanding of players’ true offensive capabilities.

Understanding eFG%

Definition and Formula

Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%) is a basketball statistic that adjusts a player’s field goal percentage to account for the extra value of three-point field goals. This metric provides a more accurate assessment of shooting abilities and offensive scoring skills at both individual and team levels. The formula for calculating eFG% is:

(2pt FGM + 1.5 * 3pt FGM) / FGA

Where:

  • 2pt FGM = Two-point field goals made
  • 3pt FGM = Three-point field goals made
  • FGA = Field goal attempts

The formula essentially assigns a weight of 1.5 to each three-point field goal made, emphasizing the higher scoring potential of three-pointers compared to two-point field goals.

Calculation Example

Let’s examine an example to better understand the eFG% calculation. Consider a player who has taken 10 field goal attempts with the following shooting pattern:

  • 4 Two-point field goals made
  • 2 Three-point field goals made

To calculate their eFG%:

  1. Compute the weighted three-pointers made: 1.5 * 2 = 3
  2. Add the weighted three-pointers made to the two-pointers made: 3 + 4 = 7
  3. Divide the total by the total number of field goal attempts: 7 / 10 = 0.7

In this example, the player’s eFG% is 70%. This percentage is higher than their regular field goal percentage (6 out of 10, or 60%), which would not take into account the extra value of three-point field goals. Consequently, eFG% offers a more precise assessment of the player’s shooting efficiency.

Importance in Basketball Analytics

Impact on Player Evaluation

Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%) plays a significant role in basketball analytics as it provides a more accurate representation of a player’s shooting efficiency. By taking into account the extra point gained from a made three-pointer, eFG% gives a clearer understanding of a player’s ability to score from different areas on the court. This statistic is particularly useful for comparing the performance of different players, as it factors in the varying values of three-point and two-point shots.

For example, consider two hypothetical players, Player A and Player B. Player A has an eFG% of 52% while Player B has an eFG% of 48%. Although both players might seem to have similar shooting ability, Player A’s higher eFG% indicates that they are likely to score more points per possession and contribute more to their team’s offense.

Comparison with Traditional FG%

The traditional Field Goal Percentage (FG%) only considers the number of successful field goal attempts divided by the total attempts, without taking into account the extra value of three-point shots. As a result, it can be misleading when evaluating the efficiency of players and teams, especially in the modern era where three-point shooting has become increasingly prominent.

To illustrate the difference between FG% and eFG%, let’s observe a simple example:

 FG MadeFG AttemptedFG%eFG%
Player X51050%60%
Player Y41040%50%

Here, Player X makes 3 two-pointers and 2 three-pointers, while Player Y makes 4 two-pointers and misses 6 three-pointers. Using the traditional FG% alone, one might assume that Player X is significantly more efficient than Player Y. However, due to the additional points provided by three-pointers, their eFG% of 60% and 50% offer a closer comparison.

In conclusion, eFG% is an essential metric in basketball analytics, as it accounts for the added value of three-point shots and enables a more accurate evaluation of player and team efficiency. By comparing eFG% to traditional FG%, analysts and coaches can gain deeper insights into shooting performance and make more informed decisions for their game strategy.